Examine the philosophical roots of the fact–value dichotomy in political science and assess whether its aspiration for value-free inquiry is intellectually sustainable. Evaluate whether post-behaviouralism represents a paradigm shift in Kuhnian terms or merely a corrective phase within the behavioural revolution.

Fact–Value Dichotomy and the Post-Behaviouralist Challenge: Revisiting the Quest for Value-Free Political Science Introduction The fact–value dichotomy occupies a central place in the methodological self-understanding of political science, particularly as articulated during the behavioural revolution of the mid-twentieth century. Rooted in positivist epistemology, the dichotomy posits a distinction between empirical statements about “what is” (facts) … Continue reading Examine the philosophical roots of the fact–value dichotomy in political science and assess whether its aspiration for value-free inquiry is intellectually sustainable. Evaluate whether post-behaviouralism represents a paradigm shift in Kuhnian terms or merely a corrective phase within the behavioural revolution.

What is the Post-Behavioural Approach in Political Science, and how does it seek to reconcile empirical analysis with normative concerns in the study of politics?

The Post-Behavioural Approach in Political Science: Reconciling Empiricism and Normativity in the Study of Politics Introduction The evolution of political science as a discipline has been deeply shaped by methodological debates concerning the nature of political inquiry. One of the most significant developments in the 20th century was the rise of the behavioural revolution during … Continue reading What is the Post-Behavioural Approach in Political Science, and how does it seek to reconcile empirical analysis with normative concerns in the study of politics?