Modern versus Traditional Approaches in Comparative Politics: A Critical Evaluation of Paradigmatic Divergence Introduction Comparative politics has undergone a profound methodological and epistemological transformation since the mid-20th century. Historically anchored in the traditional legal-institutional approach, the field emphasized the formal structures of government—constitutions, legislatures, executives, and legal norms—as the primary loci of political analysis. However, … Continue reading In what key respects does the modern approach to comparative politics diverge from the traditional legal-institutional framework in the analysis of political systems?
Tag: David Easton systems theory
To what extent did the behavioural revolution in political science redefine the epistemological foundations, methodological approaches, and normative boundaries of the discipline, and how has its legacy shaped subsequent developments in political inquiry?
The behavioural revolution in political science, which reached its peak in the mid-20th century—particularly in the United States—represented a paradigmatic shift in the epistemology, methodology, and normative orientation of the discipline. Inspired by the broader positivist turn in the social sciences, the behavioural movement sought to transform political science from a largely historical, legal-institutional, and … Continue reading To what extent did the behavioural revolution in political science redefine the epistemological foundations, methodological approaches, and normative boundaries of the discipline, and how has its legacy shaped subsequent developments in political inquiry?