To what extent can the existing international economic order be characterized as structurally unjust and hegemonically oriented against the interests of developing countries, and how does this dynamic shape global economic governance and equity in international relations?

Structural Injustice and Hegemony in the International Economic Order: Implications for Global Economic Governance The existing international economic order has long been the subject of scholarly debate, particularly regarding whether it reflects a just, inclusive framework or one structured to preserve the dominance of advanced industrial states. Rooted in post–World War II institutional arrangements, the … Continue reading To what extent can the existing international economic order be characterized as structurally unjust and hegemonically oriented against the interests of developing countries, and how does this dynamic shape global economic governance and equity in international relations?

Evaluate whether India’s emergence as a major market economy in the context of globalization has led to a shift away from its earlier advocacy for a New International Economic Order (NIEO), and assess the implications of this transformation for its global economic diplomacy.

India’s Market Emergence and the Retreat from NIEO Advocacy: A Critical Evaluation of Global Economic Diplomacy Introduction India’s post-independence foreign economic policy was grounded in the moral and structural imperatives of Third World solidarity. As a founding voice in the Group of 77 (G-77) and a principal architect of the New International Economic Order (NIEO) … Continue reading Evaluate whether India’s emergence as a major market economy in the context of globalization has led to a shift away from its earlier advocacy for a New International Economic Order (NIEO), and assess the implications of this transformation for its global economic diplomacy.