Critically examine the proposition that the US-sponsored “New World Order” constitutes a strategy of hegemonic consolidation through military superiority in response to the relative erosion of American economic and industrial dominance. How can hegemonic stability theory and theories of power transition be employed to interpret the United States’ reliance on military primacy in shaping the post–Cold War international order?

Military Primacy and the Post–Cold War “New World Order”: Hegemonic Consolidation or Structural Necessity? Introduction The articulation of a US-sponsored “New World Order” in the immediate aftermath of the Cold War—most explicitly articulated during the 1991 Gulf War—signified an attempt to redefine global order under conditions of unipolarity. While initially framed in liberal-institutionalist language emphasising … Continue reading Critically examine the proposition that the US-sponsored “New World Order” constitutes a strategy of hegemonic consolidation through military superiority in response to the relative erosion of American economic and industrial dominance. How can hegemonic stability theory and theories of power transition be employed to interpret the United States’ reliance on military primacy in shaping the post–Cold War international order?

Clarify the meaning and theoretical significance of the concept of hegemonic stability within the field of international relations.

Clarifying the Meaning and Theoretical Significance of Hegemonic Stability Theory in International Relations Introduction The concept of hegemonic stability occupies a prominent place within the theoretical landscape of international relations (IR), particularly within the realist and neoliberal traditions. At its core, hegemonic stability theory (HST) posits that the international system is more likely to remain … Continue reading Clarify the meaning and theoretical significance of the concept of hegemonic stability within the field of international relations.