Structural Inequities and Hegemonic Tendencies in the International Economic Order: A Critical Appraisal of Persistence and Power The contemporary international economic order, though outwardly legitimized by the principles of liberalization, interdependence, and global development, remains deeply structured by asymmetries of power, wealth, and institutional influence. Its normative discourse—anchored in developmental multilateralism, free trade, and inclusive … Continue reading Critically analyze the structural inequities and hegemonic tendencies embedded within the contemporary international economic order, and evaluate the political, institutional, and systemic factors that contribute to its persistence despite normative commitments to global equity and development.
Tag: hegemony
To what extent can the existing international economic order be characterized as structurally unjust and hegemonically oriented against the interests of developing countries, and how does this dynamic shape global economic governance and equity in international relations?
Structural Injustice and Hegemony in the International Economic Order: Implications for Global Economic Governance The existing international economic order has long been the subject of scholarly debate, particularly regarding whether it reflects a just, inclusive framework or one structured to preserve the dominance of advanced industrial states. Rooted in post–World War II institutional arrangements, the … Continue reading To what extent can the existing international economic order be characterized as structurally unjust and hegemonically oriented against the interests of developing countries, and how does this dynamic shape global economic governance and equity in international relations?
To what extent do the institutional frameworks of Collective Security and Collective Defence—such as the United Nations Security Council and military alliances like NATO—serve not merely as instruments for maintaining global peace and order, but also as mechanisms for entrenching the strategic interests and hegemonic dominance of major powers within the international system?
Collective Security and Collective Defence: Mechanisms of Peace or Instruments of Power? The foundational ideals of collective security and collective defence occupy a central position in the architecture of international peace and security. While the former is premised on the universal responsibility of states to deter aggression through institutions like the United Nations Security Council … Continue reading To what extent do the institutional frameworks of Collective Security and Collective Defence—such as the United Nations Security Council and military alliances like NATO—serve not merely as instruments for maintaining global peace and order, but also as mechanisms for entrenching the strategic interests and hegemonic dominance of major powers within the international system?
How did the collapse of actually existing socialism and the triumph of neoliberalism marginalize Marxist frameworks in IR, despite the persistence of global inequality and exploitative core-periphery relations?
The collapse of actually existing socialism — symbolized most dramatically by the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 — alongside the global triumph of neoliberalism in the late 20th century profoundly reshaped the intellectual terrain of international relations (IR). This twin transformation marginalized Marxist and … Continue reading How did the collapse of actually existing socialism and the triumph of neoliberalism marginalize Marxist frameworks in IR, despite the persistence of global inequality and exploitative core-periphery relations?