To what extent can it be argued that India’s policy of non-alignment has lost its relevance in the post-Cold War era, and how should its contemporary significance be understood in the context of evolving global power structures and international economic system?

India’s Policy of Non-Alignment in the Post-Cold War Era: Relevance, Transformation, and Contemporary Significance The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and the broader foreign policy of non-alignment constituted one of the most distinctive contributions of India to international relations during the Cold War. Articulated through the leadership of Jawaharlal Nehru and consolidated in collaboration with leaders such … Continue reading To what extent can it be argued that India’s policy of non-alignment has lost its relevance in the post-Cold War era, and how should its contemporary significance be understood in the context of evolving global power structures and international economic system?

To what extent do the institutional frameworks of Collective Security and Collective Defence—such as the United Nations Security Council and military alliances like NATO—serve not merely as instruments for maintaining global peace and order, but also as mechanisms for entrenching the strategic interests and hegemonic dominance of major powers within the international system?

Collective Security and Collective Defence: Mechanisms of Peace or Instruments of Power? The foundational ideals of collective security and collective defence occupy a central position in the architecture of international peace and security. While the former is premised on the universal responsibility of states to deter aggression through institutions like the United Nations Security Council … Continue reading To what extent do the institutional frameworks of Collective Security and Collective Defence—such as the United Nations Security Council and military alliances like NATO—serve not merely as instruments for maintaining global peace and order, but also as mechanisms for entrenching the strategic interests and hegemonic dominance of major powers within the international system?

Morton Kaplan’s Systems Theory and Its Conceptual Divergence from General Systems Theory: Implications for Analyzing Global Political Structures The post-World War II period in international relations theory witnessed the proliferation of interdisciplinary approaches, particularly the adoption of structural and systemic frameworks inspired by the broader field of general systems theory (GST). Among the most influential … Continue reading To what extent does Morton Kaplan’s systems theory of international politics diverge from the foundational principles of general systems theory, and how do these conceptual tensions affect its analytical utility in the study of global political systems?

Power and Authority in Political Theory: Distinctions and Implications for Legitimacy and Governance Introduction In political theory, the concepts of power and authority are foundational yet analytically distinct. While both pertain to the ability to influence behavior and structure political life, they diverge in terms of their normative grounding, modes of exercise, and implications for … Continue reading How do political theorists distinguish between the concepts of power and authority, and what are the implications of this distinction for understanding legitimacy and governance in political systems?