Can India’s claim for a permanent seat on the reformed United Nations Security Council be justified both as a matter of national interest and international equity?

India’s Quest for a Permanent Seat on a Reformed UN Security Council: National Interest and International Equity The debate over United Nations Security Council (UNSC) reform has persisted for decades, reflecting tensions between historical institutional inertia and the demands of a rapidly evolving global order. Among the most prominent aspirants for permanent membership, India presents … Continue reading Can India’s claim for a permanent seat on the reformed United Nations Security Council be justified both as a matter of national interest and international equity?

How can the constitution be conceptualized as a “power map” that structures, distributes, and legitimizes authority within a political system, and what implications does this perspective hold for understanding constitutionalism and governance?

The Constitution as a Power Map: Structuring, Distributing, and Legitimizing Authority The study of constitutionalism is inseparable from the study of power. A constitution is not merely a legal text or a compendium of institutional arrangements; it is the fundamental ordering principle of political life. To conceptualize the constitution as a power map is to … Continue reading How can the constitution be conceptualized as a “power map” that structures, distributes, and legitimizes authority within a political system, and what implications does this perspective hold for understanding constitutionalism and governance?

Aristotle’s distinction between the authority of the master and the authority of statements provides a profound analytical framework for interrogating the nature of political authority and legitimacy. This distinction illuminates the complex relationship between personal authority vested in a ruler or governing body and the normative, rational authority embedded in laws, principles, and discourse. Within … Continue reading How can Aristotle’s distinction between the authority of the master and the authority of statements be interpreted within the framework of political authority and legitimacy?

David Easton’s Systems Analysis Model: Components, Functioning, and Limitations in Political Inquiry Introduction David Easton’s systems analysis represents a foundational attempt in modern political science to develop a general theoretical framework for analyzing the functioning of political systems. Emerging in the behavioralist era of the 1950s and 1960s, Easton's approach sought to apply systems theory—originating … Continue reading How does David Easton’s systems analysis model conceptualize the functioning of a political system, and what are its key components and limitations in explaining political processes and policy outcomes?

Power and Authority in Political Theory: Distinctions and Implications for Legitimacy and Governance Introduction In political theory, the concepts of power and authority are foundational yet analytically distinct. While both pertain to the ability to influence behavior and structure political life, they diverge in terms of their normative grounding, modes of exercise, and implications for … Continue reading How do political theorists distinguish between the concepts of power and authority, and what are the implications of this distinction for understanding legitimacy and governance in political systems?