To what extent can the modern discourse on justice be understood as an attempt to reconcile the competing moral logics of liberty and equality? Evaluate this dialectic through the frameworks of Rawls’ justice as fairness, Marx’s critique of distributive justice, and Sen’s capability approach.

The discourse on justice navigates the tension between liberty and equality, exemplified by Rawls’s institutional fairness, Marx’s critique of capitalist distribution, and Sen’s capability approach. Each theorist reformulates this dialectic, revealing justice as a dynamic interplay rather than a fixed ideal, emphasizing the need for harmonizing individual freedoms and societal fairness.