Kesavananda Bharati and the Constitutionalisation of Limited Government: Trajectory, Interpretation, and Legacy in Indian Constitutional Jurisprudence The decision in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) stands as a constitutional watershed in Indian legal and political history, representing what Granville Austin famously described as the "midnight hour" of the Indian Constitution. Delivered by a historically … Continue reading To what extent can Kesavananda Bharati be seen as a turning point that constitutionalised the idea of limited government in India? Explore how Kesavananda Bharati has been interpreted and applied in subsequent landmark cases such as Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain and Minerva Mills.
Tag: Minerva Mills Case
Critically evaluate the efficacy of judicial review in India, with reference to its constitutional foundations, scope of application, and its impact on the balance of power among the organs of government.
Judicial Review in India: Constitutional Foundations, Scope, and Impact on the Balance of Power Introduction Judicial review is a cornerstone of India’s constitutional architecture. It empowers the judiciary to examine the constitutionality of legislative enactments and executive actions and to strike them down if they violate the Constitution. Rooted in the idea of constitutional supremacy, … Continue reading Critically evaluate the efficacy of judicial review in India, with reference to its constitutional foundations, scope of application, and its impact on the balance of power among the organs of government.