Kautilya’s Emphasis on Economic Provision as Political Control: A Frankfurt School / Neo-Marxist Reading Introduction Kautilya’s Arthashastra—the canonical treatise of ancient Indian statecraft—places economic provision, revenue mobilisation, and material management at the heart of political technique. The ruler is an economic manager: ensuring supply, administering land and taxes, provisioning the army and officials, maintaining granaries, … Continue reading Could Kautilya’s emphasis on economic provision be interpreted as a mechanism of political control that legitimizes hierarchical authority through material dependence? Analysing this through a Frankfurt School or neo-Marxist lens.
Tag: neo-Marxist analysis
Critically assess the relevance of the Marxist approach in the study of comparative politics and international relations in the context of globalization. Examine how core Marxist concepts—such as class struggle, imperialism, and capitalist exploitation—continue to inform analyses of global inequality, transnational capital flows, and state behavior. Discuss both the strengths and limitations of Marxist frameworks in explaining contemporary power dynamics, development disparities, and resistance movements in a globalized world.
The Marxist approach, long foundational in both comparative politics and international relations (IR), has undergone significant adaptation in response to changing historical conditions. While its classical formulations emerged in the context of 19th-century European industrial capitalism, Marxist thought continues to offer critical analytical tools for understanding the political economy of globalization, structural inequality, and the … Continue reading Critically assess the relevance of the Marxist approach in the study of comparative politics and international relations in the context of globalization. Examine how core Marxist concepts—such as class struggle, imperialism, and capitalist exploitation—continue to inform analyses of global inequality, transnational capital flows, and state behavior. Discuss both the strengths and limitations of Marxist frameworks in explaining contemporary power dynamics, development disparities, and resistance movements in a globalized world.