To what extent has the global nuclear non-proliferation regime evolved into a mechanism serving the entrenched strategic interests of nuclear-weapon states, thereby reinforcing an asymmetric international order under the pretext of maintaining political stability, and how does this dynamic affect the prospects for equitable disarmament and global security governance?

The Non-Proliferation Regime as Stratified Order: Power, Prudence, and the Politics of “Stability” Introduction Since 1968 the nuclear non-proliferation regime—anchored in the NPT, the IAEA safeguards system, export-control cartels (NSG, MTCR, Wassenaar), and later instruments such as the CTBT—has been justified as a bulwark of international stability. Critics, however, argue that the regime has ossified … Continue reading To what extent has the global nuclear non-proliferation regime evolved into a mechanism serving the entrenched strategic interests of nuclear-weapon states, thereby reinforcing an asymmetric international order under the pretext of maintaining political stability, and how does this dynamic affect the prospects for equitable disarmament and global security governance?