Redefining Article 368: Golaknath, Kesavananda Bharati, and the Emergence of the Basic Structure Doctrine in Indian Constitutional Jurisprudence The Indian Constitution is remarkable for its carefully balanced architecture that guarantees Fundamental Rights, while allowing flexibility through a structured amendment process under Article 368. However, the legal and philosophical tensions between constitutional supremacy and parliamentary sovereignty … Continue reading To what extent have the Supreme Court’s rulings in Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) and Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) redefined the constitutional limits of Article 368, particularly in relation to the amendability of Fundamental Rights, and how have these landmark verdicts shaped the doctrine of basic structure in Indian constitutional jurisprudence?