Political Corruption, Populism, and Competitive Clientelism: Erosion of Administrative Capacity and the Crisis of Governability in India The Indian democratic project has often been lauded as one of the most ambitious experiments in postcolonial state-building, combining mass political participation with constitutional guarantees of rights, developmental objectives, and plural representation. Yet, persistent concerns about the quality … Continue reading Assess the extent to which political corruption, populism, and competitive clientelism have eroded India’s administrative capacity and policy coherence. Comment on the view that India’s problems of governability reflect a mismatch between its democratic aspirations and its political-administrative capacity.
Tag: Policy Coherence
“India’s foreign policy-making structure reflects a complex interplay between institutional expertise and political leadership.” Comment.
India's foreign policy is governed by an institutional framework involving the MEA, PMO, NSA, and Parliamentary Committees, which together ensure policy-making. While they offer expertise and strategic oversight, issues like inconsistencies, limited crisis response, and inadequate parliamentary scrutiny hinder effectiveness. Suggested reforms include enhancing coordination, empowering the MEA, and improving legislative oversight.
“Institutional plurality in India’s foreign policy-making ensures democratic oversight but often results in policy incoherence.” Comment.
India's foreign policy is influenced by various institutions like the MEA, PMO, NSA, Parliament, and think tanks, each playing distinct roles. However, overlaps and bureaucratic inefficiencies hinder effective implementation. Enhancing inter-institutional coordination, increasing parliamentary oversight, and promoting independent research can strengthen synergy while preserving strategic autonomy and democratic accountability.