Critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of structural–functional analysis as a framework for understanding political systems in the developing world. Discuss how the structural–functional framework attempts to bridge the gap between traditional institutionalism and behavioralism in political science.

Structural–Functional Analysis and the Study of Political Systems in the Developing World: Strengths, Limitations, and Disciplinary Positioning The mid-twentieth century witnessed a paradigmatic shift in political science as scholars grappled with the inadequacy of formal–legal institutionalism to capture the dynamics of rapidly decolonising states in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Structural–functional analysis, pioneered by Gabriel … Continue reading Critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of structural–functional analysis as a framework for understanding political systems in the developing world. Discuss how the structural–functional framework attempts to bridge the gap between traditional institutionalism and behavioralism in political science.

The political economy perspective in Comparative Politics has redefined the understanding of state power, governance, and development. Critically analyze how dependency theory, world-systems theory, and neo-Marxist approaches explain political and economic inequalities between the Global North and the Global South.

The political economy perspective in Comparative Politics examines the interplay between economics and politics, highlighting global inequalities shaped by dependency theory, world-systems theory, and neo-Marxist approaches. These frameworks critique traditional views, arguing that colonialism, capitalist structures, and economic hierarchies perpetuate disparities, affecting state governance and policy in various global contexts.