Critically evaluate the nature and evolution of the one-party dominant system in India under the leadership of Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi. Examine its contribution to nation-building, political stability, democratic consolidation, and socio-economic transformation, while assessing its impact on political competition, institutional autonomy, federalism, and the long-term development of constitutional democracy.

Introduction The evolution of India's one-party dominant system constitutes one of the most distinctive features of postcolonial democratic politics. Unlike one-party systems found in authoritarian regimes, India's political order between 1947 and the late 1970s combined electoral competition with the sustained electoral predominance of the Indian National Congress. This phenomenon attracted considerable scholarly attention because … Continue reading Critically evaluate the nature and evolution of the one-party dominant system in India under the leadership of Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi. Examine its contribution to nation-building, political stability, democratic consolidation, and socio-economic transformation, while assessing its impact on political competition, institutional autonomy, federalism, and the long-term development of constitutional democracy.

How does Bhikhu Parekh conceptualize the functioning of India’s judicial democracy and the role of civil society within it, and what normative frameworks does he employ to critique or support the interaction between constitutionalism, pluralism, and participatory democratic practices in the Indian context?

Bhikhu Parekh on India’s Judicial Democracy, Civil Society, and the Normative Tensions of Pluralism and Constitutionalism Introduction Bhikhu Parekh, a leading political theorist of multiculturalism and postcolonial modernity, brings a distinctive lens to the study of India’s democratic experiment. While not primarily a legal scholar, Parekh's reflections on Indian democracy, civil society, and the normative … Continue reading How does Bhikhu Parekh conceptualize the functioning of India’s judicial democracy and the role of civil society within it, and what normative frameworks does he employ to critique or support the interaction between constitutionalism, pluralism, and participatory democratic practices in the Indian context?