How does Ebenstein’s interpretation of Machiavelli—viewing power as an end in itself and analyzing the means of its acquisition, retention, and expansion apart from morality, ethics, religion, and metaphysics—reshape our understanding of the autonomy of political power and the foundations of modern political realism?

Ebenstein’s interpretation of Niccolò Machiavelli is one of the most decisive moments in the historiography of political thought, for it clarifies the distinctiveness of Machiavelli’s contribution to modern political realism. By arguing that Machiavelli viewed power as an end in itself, and that he analyzed the means of its acquisition, retention, and expansion apart from … Continue reading How does Ebenstein’s interpretation of Machiavelli—viewing power as an end in itself and analyzing the means of its acquisition, retention, and expansion apart from morality, ethics, religion, and metaphysics—reshape our understanding of the autonomy of political power and the foundations of modern political realism?

Machiavelli famously argued that “it is better to be feared than loved.” To what extent can his views on power and deception be reconciled with the ethical foundations of modern democratic governance?

The essay examines the tension between Machiavellianism and democratic values, highlighting the challenges of integrating pragmatism and deception in governance. While Machiavelli argues for prioritizing power over morality, democratic systems emphasize ethics, transparency, and accountability. A balanced approach is necessary, where pragmatic strategies can enhance governance without compromising democratic integrity.