The discourse on justice navigates the tension between liberty and equality, exemplified by Rawls’s institutional fairness, Marx’s critique of capitalist distribution, and Sen’s capability approach. Each theorist reformulates this dialectic, revealing justice as a dynamic interplay rather than a fixed ideal, emphasizing the need for harmonizing individual freedoms and societal fairness.
Tag: Rawls justice as fairness
Does Rawls’s conception of social justice necessarily presuppose an overlapping consensus among competing worldviews in pluralist societies?
Rawls, Social Justice, and the Problem of Overlapping Consensus in Pluralist Societies The question of whether John Rawls’s conception of social justice necessarily presupposes an overlapping consensus among competing worldviews in pluralist societies speaks to one of the most significant challenges in contemporary political philosophy: the reconciliation of moral diversity with political stability. Rawls, in … Continue reading Does Rawls’s conception of social justice necessarily presuppose an overlapping consensus among competing worldviews in pluralist societies?
How does liberty function as a precondition for equality in political theory, and in what ways are the concepts of liberty and equality interrelated or in tension within liberal, socialist, and contemporary normative frameworks of justice and democratic governance?
Liberty and Equality in Political Theory: Foundations, Interrelations, and Tensions across Liberal, Socialist, and Contemporary Normative Frameworks Introduction Liberty and equality constitute two of the most foundational and enduring concepts in political theory. Both are indispensable to the normative architecture of democratic governance, yet they are often understood in ways that reveal conceptual tensions and … Continue reading How does liberty function as a precondition for equality in political theory, and in what ways are the concepts of liberty and equality interrelated or in tension within liberal, socialist, and contemporary normative frameworks of justice and democratic governance?
Compare the Greek concept of justice, particularly as articulated by Plato and Aristotle, with John Rawls’ modern theory of justice. Analyze the differences in their philosophical foundations, conceptions of the individual and society, and the principles used to define a just political order.
Justice in Classical and Contemporary Political Thought: A Comparative Analysis of Plato, Aristotle, and John Rawls Introduction Justice has remained a central concern of political philosophy from antiquity to modernity. While Plato and Aristotle represent the classical Greek tradition, focusing on justice as a virtue rooted in the ethical and political life of the polis, … Continue reading Compare the Greek concept of justice, particularly as articulated by Plato and Aristotle, with John Rawls’ modern theory of justice. Analyze the differences in their philosophical foundations, conceptions of the individual and society, and the principles used to define a just political order.