India’s Opposition to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT): A Realist Interpretation of Sovereignty, Security, and Global Nuclear Hierarchies India’s opposition to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) since its opening for signature in 1968 remains one of the most significant instances of resistance to a global arms control regime. While India has consistently articulated its opposition … Continue reading To what extent can India’s opposition to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) be interpreted through a realist paradigm, particularly in terms of sovereignty, security imperatives, and the critique of an unequal global nuclear order?
Tag: Realism
To what extent do the institutional frameworks of Collective Security and Collective Defence—such as the United Nations Security Council and military alliances like NATO—serve not merely as instruments for maintaining global peace and order, but also as mechanisms for entrenching the strategic interests and hegemonic dominance of major powers within the international system?
Collective Security and Collective Defence: Mechanisms of Peace or Instruments of Power? The foundational ideals of collective security and collective defence occupy a central position in the architecture of international peace and security. While the former is premised on the universal responsibility of states to deter aggression through institutions like the United Nations Security Council … Continue reading To what extent do the institutional frameworks of Collective Security and Collective Defence—such as the United Nations Security Council and military alliances like NATO—serve not merely as instruments for maintaining global peace and order, but also as mechanisms for entrenching the strategic interests and hegemonic dominance of major powers within the international system?
How did the disintegration of the Soviet Union reshape the structural dynamics of international politics, and what were its implications for global power configurations, security architectures, and normative frameworks in the post-Cold War international order?
The Disintegration of the Soviet Union and the Transformation of the Post-Cold War International Order The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 marked a watershed moment in modern international relations. As the terminal crisis of a superpower with global ideological, strategic, and military reach, the disintegration of the USSR not only ended the bipolar … Continue reading How did the disintegration of the Soviet Union reshape the structural dynamics of international politics, and what were its implications for global power configurations, security architectures, and normative frameworks in the post-Cold War international order?
How does the framework of complex interdependence, as articulated by Keohane and Nye, challenge traditional realist assumptions about the nature of international politics, particularly concerning state centrality, the hierarchy of issues, and the role of force?
The framework of complex interdependence, articulated by Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye in their seminal work Power and Interdependence (1977), represents a foundational challenge to the central assumptions of traditional realism about the nature of international politics. While realism, particularly in its classical and neorealist forms, emphasizes the primacy of the state, the dominance of … Continue reading How does the framework of complex interdependence, as articulated by Keohane and Nye, challenge traditional realist assumptions about the nature of international politics, particularly concerning state centrality, the hierarchy of issues, and the role of force?
To what extent can Plato’s political philosophy guide contemporary governance? Analyze his enduring influence on modern political systems while addressing critiques from liberalism, realism, and postmodernism.
Plato's political philosophy, primarily from The Republic, continues to influence modern governance despite facing critiques from liberal, realist, and postmodern perspectives. While his ideas on meritocratic leadership, education, and the risks of populism remain relevant, his rigid social hierarchy and anti-democratic stance are increasingly challenged, urging a balance of wisdom and democratic principles today.