Critically assess the relevance of Hobbes’ Leviathan in contemporary politics. Does his argument for order over liberty still hold in surveillance states, populist movements, and fragile democracies? Can modern democracies maintain stability without resorting to Hobbesian authoritarianism?

The essay examines the relevance of Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan in the 21st century, focusing on themes of surveillance, authoritarianism, and populism. While Hobbes' ideas justify state power as necessary for order, modern democracies illustrate that stability can be achieved without absolute authority, challenging his model and highlighting the balance between security and liberty.

Plato argues for equal education and political participation for women in the ruling class. Can his ideas be considered an early form of feminism, or do they remain limited by patriarchal assumptions?

Plato's Republic advocates for gender equality, proposing equal education and political roles for women in the guardian class, challenging traditional Athenian norms. However, his ideas are rooted in state efficiency rather than individual rights, viewing women as valuable resources for the state. Thus, despite being progressive, his philosophy contains patriarchal limitations.