Does the evolving international order call for a reinvention of the Non-Alignment Movement to maintain its relevance in contemporary global politics?

Reinventing Non-Alignment in the Evolving International Order: Relevance and Challenges Introduction The Non-Alignment Movement (NAM), formally inaugurated at the Belgrade Conference in 1961 under the leadership of figures such as Jawaharlal Nehru, Josip Broz Tito, Gamal Abdel Nasser, Kwame Nkrumah, and Sukarno, represented a historic effort by newly independent states to navigate the bipolar Cold … Continue reading Does the evolving international order call for a reinvention of the Non-Alignment Movement to maintain its relevance in contemporary global politics?

Given the prevailing strategic dynamics in Asia and notwithstanding the challenges currently confronting the United States in the region, to what extent is it probable that Washington will maintain sustained diplomatic and strategic pressure on India concerning its nuclear programme, the Kashmir dispute, and ballistic missile development, and what implications does this have for India–U.S. relations and regional security architecture?

Will Washington Sustain Pressure on India over Nukes, Kashmir, and Missiles? Probability, Modalities, and Implications Thesis Given the contemporary balance-of-power logic in Asia—defined above all by strategic competition with China—the United States is unlikely to sustain broad, coercive pressure on India over its nuclear program, Kashmir, or ballistic missile development. Instead, Washington will apply selective, … Continue reading Given the prevailing strategic dynamics in Asia and notwithstanding the challenges currently confronting the United States in the region, to what extent is it probable that Washington will maintain sustained diplomatic and strategic pressure on India concerning its nuclear programme, the Kashmir dispute, and ballistic missile development, and what implications does this have for India–U.S. relations and regional security architecture?