Introduction The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which entered into force in 1970, represents the most comprehensive and enduring legal instrument governing the international nuclear order. Negotiated in the context of escalating Cold War tensions, rapid advances in nuclear technology, and growing fears of widespread nuclear proliferation, the Treaty sought to prevent the emergence of a … Continue reading Critically evaluate the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as the cornerstone of the global non-proliferation regime. Examine the arguments supporting the view that the Treaty embodies a discriminatory distinction between nuclear-weapon and non-nuclear-weapon states, while assessing its contribution to strategic stability, nuclear disarmament, international security, and the evolution of global nuclear governance.
Tag: strategic stability
Critically evaluate the trajectory and effectiveness of the India–Pakistan peace process in the post-Kargil War period, with reference to diplomatic initiatives, confidence-building measures, and persistent challenges.
The Post-Kargil India–Pakistan Peace Process: A Critical Evaluation of Trajectory and Effectiveness Introduction The India–Pakistan peace process since the Kargil War of 1999 has been shaped by a dialectic of engagement and estrangement, oscillating between high-level diplomatic initiatives and recurrent breakdowns due to terrorism, strategic distrust, and domestic political dynamics. The Kargil conflict—occurring despite ongoing … Continue reading Critically evaluate the trajectory and effectiveness of the India–Pakistan peace process in the post-Kargil War period, with reference to diplomatic initiatives, confidence-building measures, and persistent challenges.
How should the future of nuclear deterrence be theorized in light of evolving global security dynamics, proliferation concerns, and technological advancements? Can the doctrine of preventive war serve as a viable strategic alternative to nuclear deterrence, or does it undermine the normative and stabilizing function traditionally attributed to deterrence in international relations?
Reframing the Future of Nuclear Deterrence: Strategic Stability, Preventive War, and Normative Constraints in the 21st Century Since its conceptualization during the Cold War, nuclear deterrence has served as the principal doctrine for managing strategic stability in a world of nuclear-armed states. Its core logic—preventing aggression through the threat of unacceptable retaliation—underpinned the bipolar order … Continue reading How should the future of nuclear deterrence be theorized in light of evolving global security dynamics, proliferation concerns, and technological advancements? Can the doctrine of preventive war serve as a viable strategic alternative to nuclear deterrence, or does it undermine the normative and stabilizing function traditionally attributed to deterrence in international relations?