The Doctrine of Basic Structure: A Normative Limit on Parliamentary Sovereignty in Indian Constitutionalism Introduction The doctrine of the Basic Structure stands as one of the most profound contributions of the Indian judiciary to global constitutional thought. First enunciated in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), this doctrine asserts that while Parliament possesses the … Continue reading To what extent does the doctrine of the Basic Structure of the Indian Constitution serve as a normative constraint on parliamentary sovereignty, and how has its judicial articulation influenced constitutional interpretation, democratic resilience, and institutional balance within the Indian polity?
Tag: Supreme Court constitutional interpretation
Examine the argument that the Basic Structure Doctrine is inherently embedded within the Indian Constitution and that the Supreme Court, through its jurisprudence, has merely articulated and made explicit its foundational principles. Discuss its implications for constitutional interpretation and the limits of parliamentary sovereignty.
The Basic Structure Doctrine: Embedded Constitutionalism and the Limits of Parliamentary Sovereignty Introduction The Basic Structure Doctrine (BSD), as propounded by the Supreme Court of India in the landmark case of Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), asserts that certain fundamental features of the Constitution—such as democracy, rule of law, separation of powers, federalism, … Continue reading Examine the argument that the Basic Structure Doctrine is inherently embedded within the Indian Constitution and that the Supreme Court, through its jurisprudence, has merely articulated and made explicit its foundational principles. Discuss its implications for constitutional interpretation and the limits of parliamentary sovereignty.