Machiavelli argues that the use of violence is sometimes necessary for political stability. Can a political order be sustained without coercion? Compare his views with Hobbes, Weber, and contemporary perspectives on state violence.

2nd March 20251st September 2025 ~ Polity Prober

The essay examines the necessity of violence in politics, focusing on Machiavelli's view that strategic violence is essential for maintaining power. It compares his ideas with those of Hobbes and Weber, highlighting their differing stances on legitimacy and state violence. The discussion extends to contemporary issues, showing that coercion remains vital in governance.