Assess India’s role in fostering regional cooperation within South Asia in the context of the establishment of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and its impact on promoting mutual collaboration among member states.

~ Polity Prober

India’s Role in Fostering Regional Cooperation within South Asia: The SAARC Experience and its Impact on Mutual Collaboration

Introduction

Regional cooperation in South Asia has been shaped by a complex interplay of historical legacies, asymmetrical power dynamics, and shared developmental aspirations. The establishment of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) in 1985 represented an institutional effort to promote economic, cultural, and political collaboration among South Asian nations. As the largest and most influential country in the region, India has played a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory, opportunities, and limitations of SAARC. This essay critically assesses India’s role in fostering regional cooperation through SAARC, analyzing its strategic interests, bilateral tensions, developmental initiatives, and the broader implications of SAARC’s mixed record in promoting mutual collaboration.

I. Genesis of SAARC and India’s Initial Ambivalence

The idea of regional cooperation in South Asia was first formally proposed by Bangladesh in 1980. However, India initially approached the proposal with skepticism. Concerned about possible encirclement by smaller neighbors and wary of multilateral constraints on its bilateral engagements, India viewed regional institutionalization as potentially diluting its strategic autonomy.

Nonetheless, by 1985, India agreed to join the initiative, recognizing its potential to enhance regional stability, improve economic integration, and counter external influence, particularly during the Cold War. India’s agreement was instrumental in launching SAARC with seven founding members: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, and the Maldives (Afghanistan joined later in 2007).

II. India’s Contributions to SAARC’s Institutional and Programmatic Evolution

As the regional hegemon in terms of economy, military capability, and geopolitical clout, India has been central to both the ideological framework and practical agenda of SAARC.

1. Economic and Trade Initiatives

  • India was a key proponent of the South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA), signed in 2004 and implemented in 2006, aimed at reducing trade barriers among member states.
  • India has extended unilateral trade concessions to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in the region under SAFTA and provided preferential market access to Bhutan, Nepal, and Bangladesh.

2. Connectivity and Development Projects

  • India has consistently advocated for regional connectivity, emphasizing road, rail, and energy integration, such as the India-Bangladesh Power Grid, BBIN Motor Vehicles Agreement, and the SAARC Satellite Project (which was ultimately implemented outside the SAARC framework due to political constraints).
  • India has also invested in capacity-building through the SAARC Development Fund (SDF) and initiatives in education, health, and disaster management.

3. Normative and Strategic Leadership

  • India has supported the SAARC Charter of Democracy and promoted institutional reforms to enhance the efficacy of the SAARC Secretariat.
  • India has taken the lead in proposing frameworks on counter-terrorism, climate change, and women’s empowerment, aligning regional cooperation with its own global strategic ambitions.

III. Structural Constraints and Bilateral Tensions: The India-Pakistan Impasse

Despite India’s proactive role, SAARC has remained largely stagnant and underperforming as a regional organization, primarily due to the India-Pakistan rivalry, which has consistently undermined multilateral initiatives.

  • The 2016 SAARC Summit in Islamabad was canceled after India and several other member states pulled out following the Uri terrorist attack, exemplifying how bilateral tensions compromise regionalism.
  • India’s preference for bilateralism over multilateral negotiation, particularly in dealing with Pakistan, has limited SAARC’s capacity to evolve into a robust platform for dispute resolution or collective action.
  • Strategic asymmetry has also led smaller countries to balance against India by invoking extra-regional actors like China, further weakening intra-regional trust.

IV. India’s Shift Toward Sub-Regionalism and Alternative Platforms

Frustrated with SAARC’s lack of progress, India has increasingly focused on sub-regional initiatives and alternative groupings:

  • BIMSTEC (Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation), which excludes Pakistan, has emerged as a preferred platform for India to advance economic cooperation and connectivity in the Bay of Bengal region.
  • BBIN (Bangladesh-Bhutan-India-Nepal) corridor is another functional sub-regional initiative that aligns with India’s Neighbourhood First and Act East policies.
  • India’s strategic emphasis has also shifted toward bilateral and trilateral cooperation, with countries such as Sri Lanka, Maldives, and Bangladesh, where it has made significant gains in infrastructure and energy diplomacy.

V. Impact of India’s Role on Regional Cooperation

Positive Impacts

  • India’s economic and infrastructural support has strengthened developmental cooperation in the region.
  • Initiatives on disaster response, health (e.g., regional collaboration during the COVID-19 pandemic), and technology (e.g., SAARC COVID-19 Emergency Fund) have showcased India’s regional leadership capacity.
  • India’s cultural and historical commonalities with South Asian countries have fostered soft power influence, including educational exchanges, people-to-people ties, and diaspora networks.

Limitations and Negative Externalities

  • India’s overwhelming dominance is often perceived as hegemonic, breeding distrust among smaller neighbors.
  • The absence of effective conflict-resolution mechanisms within SAARC, partly due to India’s insistence on excluding bilateral disputes, has rendered the organization toothless on security matters.
  • Excessive politicization of SAARC processes has diluted its functional agenda, leading to implementation fatigue and disillusionment among member states.

Conclusion

India’s role in fostering regional cooperation through SAARC is marked by a combination of normative commitment, developmental leadership, and strategic ambivalence. While India has undeniably contributed to regional connectivity, trade, and humanitarian collaboration, the SAARC experiment remains constrained by bilateral tensions, especially with Pakistan, and the absence of institutional mechanisms to depoliticize regionalism. Consequently, India’s pivot toward sub-regionalism and issue-based coalitions reflects a broader disillusionment with SAARC’s potential.

For India to revitalize SAARC as a credible mechanism of regional integration, it must balance its strategic interests with regional sensitivities, demonstrate flexibility in multilateral engagements, and support institutional innovations that transcend geopolitical rivalries. Only then can SAARC evolve from a symbolic entity into a transformative platform for South Asian unity and prosperity.

Discover more from Polity Prober

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.