Political Contingencies versus Constitutional Provisions in Shaping Centre–State Relations in India: A Critical Assessment Introduction Indian federalism, as enshrined in the Constitution, was designed as a quasi-federal system, combining a strong central authority with autonomous state governments. However, the practical working of Centre–State relations has often diverged from the formal constitutional framework, influenced less by … Continue reading Critically assess the extent to which the trajectory of Centre–State relations in India has been shaped more by political contingencies and party dynamics than by the formal provisions of constitutional law. In doing so, examine how factors such as ruling party alignments, coalition politics, regional assertiveness, and political centralisation have influenced the practical workings of Indian federalism beyond the normative constitutional framework.
Tag: Article 356
Critically examine the discretionary powers conferred upon the Governor under the Indian Constitution, assessing their constitutional basis, scope, and implications for federalism and democratic governance in India.
Discretionary Powers of the Governor: Constitutional Basis, Scope, and Implications for Federalism and Democratic Governance in India Introduction The office of the Governor, as the constitutional head of a state, occupies a unique position within India’s federal structure. While the Governor is expected to act as a neutral constitutional authority, serving as a bridge between … Continue reading Critically examine the discretionary powers conferred upon the Governor under the Indian Constitution, assessing their constitutional basis, scope, and implications for federalism and democratic governance in India.