Crisis and Renewal: The Decline and Revival of Political Theory in the Mid-20th Century
Abstract
The perceived decline of political theory in the mid-20th century has been a subject of critical reflection within the discipline of political science. This essay analyzes the intellectual, methodological, and institutional factors that contributed to this crisis—most notably the behavioral revolution, the rise of positivism, and the marginalization of normative inquiry. It then traces the resurgence of political theory through methodological pluralism, the normative turn in political philosophy, and the influence of critical, feminist, and postcolonial perspectives. Far from disappearing, political theory has reconstituted itself as a more diverse, self-reflective, and interdisciplinary field, now central to contemporary discussions about democracy, justice, and power.
1. Introduction: Framing the Crisis of Political Theory
In the aftermath of World War II and into the 1950s and 1960s, political theory was widely believed to be in a state of decline. Prominent voices within political science expressed concern over its relevance, rigor, and methodological coherence. The crisis of political theory was not merely academic; it reflected broader tensions between empirical analysis and normative reflection, scientific rigor and philosophical inquiry, and value-neutrality versus value-laden discourse.
As Sheldon Wolin (1969) famously observed, political theory was in danger of becoming irrelevant within a discipline increasingly dominated by behavioral and empirical approaches. The story of political theory’s decline is also the story of its resilience and transformation.
2. The Behavioral Revolution and the Suppression of Normative Inquiry
One of the principal factors contributing to the marginalization of political theory was the behavioral revolution, which took hold in the American political science community during the 1950s. Heavily influenced by the methods of the natural sciences and logical positivism, behavioralism emphasized:
- Empirical observation,
- Quantification of political behavior,
- Value-neutral analysis,
- Rejection of metaphysical or speculative reasoning.
Political science, under the influence of figures like David Easton, Gabriel Almond, and Harold Lasswell, sought to become a “science of politics.” Political theory, with its historical depth, normative commitments, and abstract reasoning, was seen as pre-scientific or ideological. Easton (1953) famously called for a “systematic political theory” grounded in scientific methodology, further marginalizing classical and normative approaches.
This shift was institutionalized in departments and journals, where theory lost space to behaviorally focused studies of voting, interest groups, and political institutions.
3. The Post-War Disillusionment and Historical Contingencies
Beyond methodological preferences, the historical context of the mid-20th century also shaped the perceived decline of political theory. The horrors of fascism, Stalinism, and total war had discredited many traditional ideologies. Liberalism, socialism, and conservatism were all implicated in crises of legitimacy.
The Holocaust, atomic bomb, and Cold War created a political atmosphere skeptical of grand theories and utopian ideals. In this environment, normative theory was often dismissed as detached from reality or dangerously ideological. As Leo Strauss (1953) argued, the crisis of political theory was a crisis of meaning and purpose in a world dominated by technocracy and nihilism.
4. Responses and Revivals: The Re-emergence of Normative Theory
By the late 1960s and into the 1970s, political theory began to reassert itself. Several key developments contributed to its revival:
a. The Rawlsian Revolution
John Rawls’s A Theory of Justice (1971) marked a turning point by reintroducing normative theory to the mainstream of political philosophy. Rawls combined the rigor of analytical philosophy with a moral defense of liberal egalitarianism, offering a systematic theory of justice grounded in reason and fairness. His work inspired extensive engagement across ideological lines, including responses from Robert Nozick, Michael Walzer, and Charles Taylor.
b. The Cambridge School and Contextualism
The historical turn in political theory, led by scholars such as Quentin Skinner, J.G.A. Pocock, and John Dunn, emphasized the importance of contextualizing political texts within their linguistic and ideological settings. This approach revitalized interest in the history of political thought as a mode of inquiry distinct from political philosophy, bridging the gap between empirical political science and interpretive theory.
c. Critical Theory and the Frankfurt School
Thinkers like Herbert Marcuse, Theodor Adorno, and later Jürgen Habermas reconnected political theory with emancipatory critique. Habermas’s theory of communicative action and deliberative democracy redefined political legitimacy in post-metaphysical terms, providing new normative resources for democratic theory.
5. Feminist, Postcolonial, and Intersectional Challenges
Political theory’s renewal was also driven by its opening to voices and traditions historically marginalized by the canon.
- Feminist political theorists like Carole Pateman, Iris Marion Young, and Susan Moller Okin challenged the gendered assumptions of the social contract tradition, liberal individualism, and public-private dichotomies.
- Postcolonial theorists such as Frantz Fanon, Partha Chatterjee, and Gayatri Spivak exposed the Eurocentrism of classical political theory and emphasized the colonial and racial dimensions of power, identity, and resistance.
- Intersectional theorists emphasized that categories like gender, race, and class must be analyzed relationally and contextually, not as isolated variables.
These contributions diversified political theory and reoriented its focus toward the lived experiences and struggles of marginalized groups, thereby enriching both its normative scope and analytical depth.
6. The Institutional Repositioning of Political Theory
In response to the earlier crisis, political theory repositioned itself within political science and across disciplines. Today, it interacts with:
- Philosophy (especially moral and analytic traditions),
- Sociology (especially through critical and interpretive theory),
- Anthropology and cultural studies (especially regarding power, identity, and discourse),
- Law and jurisprudence (especially in theories of rights, justice, and constitutionalism).
Political theory is now both a disciplinary subfield and an interdisciplinary endeavor, influencing debates on climate ethics, algorithmic governance, democratic legitimacy, and global justice.
7. Conclusion: From Decline to Pluralism
The mid-20th century crisis of political theory was both a reflection of political disillusionment and a disciplinary narrowing driven by the dominance of empirical-positivist methods. However, rather than fading, political theory responded with intellectual innovation, normative reconstruction, and interdisciplinary engagement.
Today, the field is characterized by methodological pluralism, normative sophistication, and a renewed commitment to critical reflection on power, identity, and justice. From Rawlsian liberalism to decolonial and feminist critique, political theory has not only survived its crisis but emerged more expansive, inclusive, and relevant than ever.
Discover more from Polity Prober
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.